First-Order Predicate Logic (FOPL), also called First-Order Logic (FOL), extends Propositional Logic by introducing quantifiers, predicates, and variables.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!- Unlike propositional logic, which deals only with true or false statements, FOPL allows reasoning about objects, their properties, and relationships.
1.) Syntax of FOPL:
The syntax of Predicate Logic defines the rules for constructing valid logical expressions using:
- Constants: Represent specific objects (e.g., Socrates, Earth, 5).
- Variables: Represent generalized objects (e.g., x, y, z).
- Predicates: Represent relationships between objects (e.g., Loves(John, Mary) means “John loves Mary”).
- Functions: Map objects to other objects (e.g., Father(John) → Robert).
- Logical Connectives: Similar to propositional logic: AND (∧), OR (∨), NOT (¬), IMPLIES (→), IFF (↔).
- Quantifiers: Express statements about all or some objects.
Example:
“All humans are mortal.”
- Formal representation:
- ∀x(Human(x)→Mortal(x))
- (“For all x, if x is a human, then x is mortal.”)
“Some animals are carnivores.”
- Formal representation:
- ∃x(Animal(x)∧Carnivore(x))
- (“There exists an x such that x is an animal and x is a carnivore.”)
2.) Semantics of FOPL:
The semantics of predicate logic define how logical expressions are interpreted in terms of objects, domains, and relationships.
Components:
- Domain (D): The set of objects under consideration (e.g., the set of all living beings).
- Interpretation (I): Assigns meaning to predicates and functions.
- Truth Values: Sentences in FOPL are evaluated as true or false based on the domain and interpretation.
Example:
If the domain is all humans, and the predicate Mortal(x) means “x is mortal”, then:
- ∀x (Human(x) → Mortal(x)) is true, since all known humans are mortal.
3.) Quantification in FOPL:
Quantifiers define the scope of a logical statement by specifying whether it applies to all or some objects.
Types of Quantifiers:
1.) Universal Quantifier (∀): Specifies that a statement is true for all elements in the domain.
Example:
- ∀x(Bird(x)→CanFly(x))
- (“All birds can fly.”)
2.) Existential Quantifier (∃): Specifies that a statement is true for at least one element in the domain.
Example:
- ∃x(Mammal(x)∧LaysEggs(x))
- (“There exists a mammal that lays eggs.”)
- Valid Example: The platypus fits this description.
4.) Inference in FOPL:
Inference in predicate logic involves deriving new knowledge from existing facts using logical rules.
Existential and Universal Instantiation:
- Universal Instantiation (UI):
- From a general statement, we derive a specific case.
- Example:
- Given: ∀x (Human(x) → Mortal(x))
- Infer: Human(Socrates) → Mortal(Socrates)
- (“If all humans are mortal, then Socrates is mortal.”)
- Existential Instantiation (EI):
- From “there exists an x,” we introduce a new constant to represent it.
- Example:
- Given: ∃x (Mammal(x) ∧ LaysEggs(x))
- Infer: Mammal(Platypus) ∧ LaysEggs(Platypus)
Unification and Lifting:
1.) Unification: A process of making logical expressions identical by substituting variables.
- Example:
- Given: Parent(x, y), Parent(John, Mary)
- Unification: x=John,y=Mary
2.) Lifting: Applying unification in generalized cases in inference.
Inference Using Resolution:
Resolution is a rule of inference that allows us to infer new knowledge by eliminating contradictions.
Example:
- Given Statements:
- ∀x (Bird(x) → CanFly(x))
- Bird(Penguin)
- Flawed Deduction:
- Infer: CanFly(Penguin) ❌ (Incorrect because penguins cannot fly)
- Correction:
- Add exceptional cases:
- ∀x (Bird(x) ∧ ¬Penguin(x) → CanFly(x))
- (“All birds except penguins can fly.”)
- Add exceptional cases:
Thus, resolution helps refine knowledge and avoid incorrect conclusions.
5.) Example of a Full Inference Chain:
Premises:
- All humans are mortal → ∀x (Human(x) → Mortal(x))
- Socrates is human → Human(Socrates)
Apply Universal Instantiation:
- Mortal(Socrates) (From ∀x (Human(x) → Mortal(x)))
Conclusion:
- Socrates is mortal. ✅
This shows how predicate logic can be used to prove statements through inference.